Linked by twitterfire on Mon 24th Oct 2011 22:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 494212
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: I'm sorry, but how is this new?
by Nelson on Tue 25th Oct 2011 12:43
in reply to "RE[4]: I'm sorry, but how is this new?"
Sure, Lispmacros can do that. That's about it though.
I don't understand with the obsession people have with undermining whats been done here. You guys try so hard to find something, anything, to knock this project on, because it can't possibly be that Microsoft innovates on anything.
Other platforms offer one aspect, or a few aspects of Roslyn. None of them does them all in as a cohesive language as this. Especially not for a statically typed language.
RE[6]: I'm sorry, but how is this new?
by BiPolar on Tue 25th Oct 2011 16:08
in reply to "RE[5]: I'm sorry, but how is this new?"
I don't understand with the obsession people have with undermining whats been done here. You guys try so hard to find something, anything, to knock this project on, because it can't possibly be that Microsoft innovates on anything.
At least I, the only thing that I complain about is the language/tone: "If it succeeds, it will reinvent how we view compilers and compiled languages altogether.".
That's just crap, marketing talk.
Other platforms offer one aspect, or a few aspects of Roslyn. None of them does them all in as a cohesive language as this. Especially not for a statically typed language.
That's the way they should have say it. (Not sure if that's too broken to be English, sorry.)





Member since:
2011-10-25
You mean like Lisp macros?