Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 25th Oct 2011 23:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 494354
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Just buy a Linux system as you would buy a Windows system ... buy a system with Linux pre-installed for you. You will then have none of the troubles that some people have with self-installed OSes. *Nothing* lags.
1. "Buy a new computer" is a stupid, wasteful solution.
2. I have a box with Unichrome graphics, and yes, GUIs are very laggy on it in Linux - and not laggy at all in Windows. Hard to say why, though I have a hunch it's mostly down to a) bad 2D acceleration support and b) GTK2's double-buffering habit, which kills performance on older machines.
3. I know damn well how to set up X and video acceleration, and if I didn't, a distro like Ubuntu would do that for me.
- Linux has an unfortunate inverse relationship between performance and user friendliness; e.g. KDE4 is as slow as Vista, while stand alone WMs are very fast but take some geekiness to use.
Oh really?
On my PII 450mhz KDE4 is much faster than XP was.
Edited 2011-10-26 03:31 UTC





Member since:
2006-05-23
That is one of the major reasons people continue to use XP.
- Vista is astoundingly slow even on good hardware.
- 7 performs better but still has kind of absurd hardware requirements, and is rather expensive.
- Linux has an unfortunate inverse relationship between performance and user friendliness; e.g. KDE4 is as slow as Vista, while stand alone WMs are very fast but take some geekiness to use.
Now I'll give you that Linux with Xfce has pretty much the same performance/usability profile as XP (probably better at both, on well supported hardware). But there are other issues:
- Hardware support. Linux support for low-end graphics cards is *bad*, for example. Try any distro on something with a Via Unichrome chipset. *Everything* lags, hardware acceleration or no.
- Software support. There is a ton of specialized software for Windows that doesn't exist for Linux, and Wine cannot be depended on.
- People don't want to bother learning a whole new OS, and may just not have the time.
So I can see very well why some people stick with XP, despite its grotesquely bad default security.