Linked by twitterfire on Tue 25th Oct 2011 21:15 UTC
Multimedia, AV ABC.net.au has published an article titled "The Case for Piracy". The writer shows how copyright has been hijacked by corporations and that publishers are their own worst enemies. "One of the main reasons we all have anti-piracy slogans embedded in our brains is because the music industry chose to try and protect its existing market and revenue streams at all costs and marginalise and vilify those who didn't want to conform to the harsh new rules being set."
Thread beginning with comment 494377
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: DRM = no copyright
by Moredhas on Wed 26th Oct 2011 04:36 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: DRM = no copyright"
Moredhas
Member since:
2008-04-10

I could personally consider the contract of copyright broken at the first extension after my purchase. I could buy something with the understanding it will be free and public culture in another ten years' time, and then BAM, there goes my life long dream of releasing a compilation album!

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: DRM = no copyright
by Kivada on Thu 27th Oct 2011 02:53 in reply to "RE[3]: DRM = no copyright"
Kivada Member since:
2010-07-07

Too bad here in the US it's already extended to something like 75 years after the death of the creator. So in effect far longer then any of our children will live to see it released...

Reply Parent Score: 2