Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Oct 2011 10:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 494474
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Aggressive pricing?
by taschenorakel on Wed 26th Oct 2011 21:35
in reply to "RE[4]: Aggressive pricing?"
There's no feature parity there.
These are it's competitors. What you linked is closer to the Lumia 710, which has a similar price tag.
http://thisismynext.com/2011/10/26/nokia-lumia-800-vs-iphone-4s-htc...
That article doesn't talk about hardware specs, sorry but you something better to support your point.
Maybe you should check the Lumia 800 specs before putting it into same class as iPhone or recent Android phones: 800x480 pixel resolution, single core CPU, only 512 MB RAM, no NFC, dull software, ... that's definitely just middle class in October 2011. Only feature that slightly puts the phone out of that class is the camera.
RE[6]: Aggressive pricing?
by Straho on Fri 28th Oct 2011 13:35
in reply to "RE[5]: Aggressive pricing?"




Member since:
2011-10-12
what competitors? iphone, android? lol!
the competition are the many other WP7 phones on the market:
http://www.amazon.de/s?field-keywords=windows%20phone%207
There's no feature parity there.
These are it's competitors. What you linked is closer to the Lumia 710, which has a similar price tag.
http://thisismynext.com/2011/10/26/nokia-lumia-800-vs-iphone-4s-htc...
Edited 2011-10-26 19:08 UTC