Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Oct 2011 20:42 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 494826
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
ALAC is worse than FLAC in just about all aspects, except that it's natively supported by Apple products. Both decoding and encoding ALAC has been supported by ffmpeg for quite a long while as well. I guess those are the reasons they chose to open source it.
Use FLAC or WavPack.




Member since:
2006-01-26
So, if I was considering one or more lossless audio formats, I can imagine three major questions that come to mind:
1) Which produces smaller files?
2) Which performs better for encoding/decoding?
3) Which one is most flexible for metadata storage within the file format?
Any conclusive comparisons between ALAC and FLAC for these? I admit, I just glossed over the first page of google results when I checked, and didn't see anything substantial.