Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 30th Oct 2011 00:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 494953
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
How does ubuntu just release a single version that works on 85% of computers out there made by any manufacturer? They have a single tree of code with drivers for a variety of hardware, and no special interfaces for the different computer makes. Its not that impossible, and shouldn't be difficult to do the same on the mobile front. This is the direction that the manufactures need to go in.
While I agree that going in that direction would be beneficial, it happening seems unlikely to me. My understanding is that ARM, unlike the chips commonly used in general-purpose computers, has no standard mechanism (like the BIOS is on x86, for example) to automatically enumerate attached devices to the OS. So the OS has to know, essentially, which phone it's running on in advance (at least until ARM gets its own "BIOS").
RE[2]: lack of tree syncs.
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Mon 31st Oct 2011 18:53
in reply to "RE: lack of tree syncs. "





Member since:
2006-07-14
There is no arguing with the chart. You can complain that there are a lot more phones not on the chart, but you can't argue with its obvious correctness in showing the intended information.
Now why is the chart the way that it is? How does ubuntu just release a single version that works on 85% of computers out there made by any manufacturer? They have a single tree of code with drivers for a variety of hardware, and no special interfaces for the different computer makes. Its not that impossible, and shouldn't be difficult to do the same on the mobile front. This is the direction that the manufactures need to go in.