Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 30th Oct 2011 00:20 UTC
Google "Let's not mince words here: This 'Android and iPhone Update History' chart [OSNews item] is not a good chart. Oh, it's a pretty chart, to be sure artfully illustrated and researched. But this chart - done up by Michael Degusta at The Understatement and reposted by anyone unable to think clearly, apparently - is not a good chart. Or at the very least, it fails to recognize a fundamental difference between Android and iOS and the iPhone."
Thread beginning with comment 494960
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Semi-Relevant
by tbutler on Sun 30th Oct 2011 19:00 UTC in reply to "Semi-Relevant"
Member since:

Well, Apple has a low, middle and high end phone now. Seems relevant to me. There is nothing that requires a company to frequently release variants -- maybe the point should be that is a very bad idea.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Semi-Relevant
by zima on Sun 6th Nov 2011 23:14 in reply to "RE: Semi-Relevant"
zima Member since:

Not anywhere near low, you just show you're tainted by very atypical place. "Low" is something like S30 Nokia 101 (25€ or so without contract, dual sim, radio & mp3 player) or S40 X2-05 (45€ without contract' also camera, apps, browser).

We might of course limit ourselves to arbitrary label of "smartphones" - still, newer & better S40 devices encroach into this territory. Sub-100 (without contract) Android handsets are firmly within it.
Anything iPhone is at most middle. Apple openly boasts its business goal to ignore "lesser" people, to go after high-margins ones, that is why more than few variants is suboptimal.

Reply Parent Score: 2