Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 31st Oct 2011 12:59 UTC, submitted by Martin H Hansen
Thread beginning with comment 495005
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Indeed, I mean accelerated 2D. Currently, all drawing is done by software on a framebuffer. Moving a window across the display makes my eyes hurt. I'm not arguing that the device is useless without 2D acceleration, rather that it's a much smoother experience with it. And if the device can do it (maybe by using 3D to accelerate 2D if it lacks dedicated 2D hardware) then the software should employ it to that purpose. IMO that would be a much worthier goal than running N other OSes.
Currently, all drawing is done by software on a framebuffer. Moving a window across the display makes my eyes hurt. I'm not arguing that the device is useless without 2D acceleration, rather that it's a much smoother experience with it.
Yet when running RISC OS on the same device moving and scrolling windows is super smooth and fast, and that has no acceleration either. Maybe you should be asking the LXDE developers why their code is so sub-optimal!





Member since:
2005-07-06
I don't think he means 3D acceleration ...it's not even something that Openbox (typically paired with LXDE) has any means to use, IIRC.