Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 31st Oct 2011 12:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 495019
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Them are fighting words...
by Delgarde on Mon 31st Oct 2011 20:10
in reply to "RE[2]: Them are fighting words..."
I would like a citation for that because that seems to be a new piece of information. Will windows run normally without any restrictions if secure boot is disabled?
New information? Hardly - look at any of the previous posts on the subject, and you'll see them talking about the OEM branding issue. Because from day one, that's what it's been about - OEMs can't put that little Windows sticker on the case if the machine doesn't use secure-boot.




Member since:
2011-01-28
twitterfire,
"...but they don't require secure boot to be enabled by default. Nobody stops hardware vendors to allow secure boot to be disabled."
I would like a citation for that because that seems to be a new piece of information. Will windows run normally without any restrictions if secure boot is disabled?