Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 31st Oct 2011 23:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 495154
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The use of ECC is not mind-boggling!
by Luminair on Tue 1st Nov 2011 15:37
in reply to "RE: The use of ECC is not mind-boggling!"
RE[3]: The use of ECC is not mind-boggling!
by unclefester on Wed 2nd Nov 2011 11:23
in reply to "RE[2]: The use of ECC is not mind-boggling!"
RE[3]: The use of ECC is not mind-boggling!
by zima on Mon 7th Nov 2011 23:37
in reply to "RE[2]: The use of ECC is not mind-boggling!"
I'm skeptical of where you've taken this. You say you know what most Mac Pros are used for, AND you know those things don't need ECC. Really? Mac Pro isn't the only professional workstation sold with ECC memory, so either everyone is nuts or you're missing something
Hm, glancing quickly over the thread, we have here(!) one Mac Pro in fairly general usage (the machine sleeps most of the time), one in video editing, somebody who probably has seen many machines in ~photo & ~publishing (so far mostly just fancy-feel media stuff) ...and one example of some constant data processing (but, with experiences of poor storage error handling by OSX). Plus some unspecified "they are used for serious big calculations" while others point out Mac Pros are actually in too low league for that.
Yeah...
So with this class of machines, there might be at least some amount of "nuts" happening after all... ( http://www.osnews.com/permalink?496342 , http://www.osnews.com/permalink?496363 ?)





Member since:
2005-06-29
I didn't say it's useless - I meant it is useless for most of the workloads Mac Pros are used for.