Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 1st Nov 2011 22:55 UTC
Microsoft "Steve Ballmer had a dilemma. He had two groups at Microsoft pursuing competing visions for tablet computers. One group, led by Xbox godfather J Allard, was pushing for a sleek, two-screen tablet called the Courier that users controlled with their finger or a pen. But it had a problem: it was running a modified version of Windows. That ran headlong into the vision of tablet computing laid out by Steven Sinofsky, the head of Microsoft's Windows division. Sinofsky was wary of any product - let alone one from inside Microsoft's walls - that threatened the foundation of Microsoft's flagship operating system. But Sinofsky's tablet-friendly version of Windows was more than two years away." I'm still mad at Microsoft for this one.
Thread beginning with comment 495330
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: They was right
by Laurence on Wed 2nd Nov 2011 13:54 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: They was right"
Member since:

I think they could make something that would sell, if it wasn't for the iPad hype.

They have such a dominant position with Windows and Office, they should be able to exploit that with a tablet that complements those two products.

Then again a lot of companies make tablets and either making a loss or not making much money. It may be too much trouble or too big a risk for too little profit.

MS have never been bothered about running a project at a heavy loss as long as there was the potential to cut into someone else's profit margin.

Edited 2011-11-02 13:55 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: They was right
by MOS6510 on Wed 2nd Nov 2011 13:59 in reply to "RE[6]: They was right"
MOS6510 Member since:

True, but a tablet of Microsoft would rather cut in sales of The Others and not a lot in Apple's, who'd still be taking home the treasure chest.

It's a shame, because Microsoft has the money, people and experience to make potential interesting stuff.

Reply Parent Score: 1