Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 1st Nov 2011 22:55 UTC
Microsoft "Steve Ballmer had a dilemma. He had two groups at Microsoft pursuing competing visions for tablet computers. One group, led by Xbox godfather J Allard, was pushing for a sleek, two-screen tablet called the Courier that users controlled with their finger or a pen. But it had a problem: it was running a modified version of Windows. That ran headlong into the vision of tablet computing laid out by Steven Sinofsky, the head of Microsoft's Windows division. Sinofsky was wary of any product - let alone one from inside Microsoft's walls - that threatened the foundation of Microsoft's flagship operating system. But Sinofsky's tablet-friendly version of Windows was more than two years away." I'm still mad at Microsoft for this one.
Thread beginning with comment 495380
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: They was right
by MOS6510 on Wed 2nd Nov 2011 18:45 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: They was right"
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

In The Netherlands in the late 70s/early 80s you could spot a few Atari 2600 consoles, but most consoles were Phillips Videopacs.

When the Commodore 64 arrived most people when for it, mainly because of the "free" software. After that people upgraded to Amiga's and a few to the Atari ST.

Home computers were THE game computers. We used to laugh at PCs that beeped and had these strange ugly looking CGA screens.

Reply Parent Score: 2