Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Nov 2011 19:34 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Hardware, Embedded Systems A big issue right now in the world of operating systems - especially Linux - is Microsoft's requirement that all Windows 8 machines ship with UEFI's secure boot enabled, with no requirement that OEMs implement it so users can turn it off. This has caused some concern in the Linux world, and considering Microsoft's past and current business practices and the incompetence of OEMs, that's not unwarranted. CNet's Ed Bott decided to pose the issue to OEMs. Dell stated is has plans to include the option to turn secure boot off, while HP was a bit more vague about the issue.
Thread beginning with comment 495716
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by Soulbender
by shmerl on Thu 3rd Nov 2011 22:22 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Soulbender"
shmerl
Member since:
2010-06-08

XP is still supported, while it's not uncommon to have laptops that can't work with XP because manufacturers didn't care (no drivers), targeting them only for Vista for example. So forget about business reasons, we are talking about having solid standards and rules.

Edited 2011-11-03 22:23 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

What do you mean exactly.

My clients only have software that can run On windows 2000 or XP and they won't retrain their staff .. so what is the answer ...

Comon ... what is it?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[8]: Comment by Soulbender
by shmerl on Thu 3rd Nov 2011 22:39 in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Soulbender"
shmerl Member since:
2010-06-08

I mean that the argument like "manufacturers will care about supporting both Windows 7 and 8 on each machine" is not true. Practice showed that they didn't do it with previous versions of Windows, so why suddenly they would do it now.

Edited 2011-11-03 22:40 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2