Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Nov 2011 19:34 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Thread beginning with comment 495730
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by AnythingButVista
by lucas_maximus on Thu 3rd Nov 2011 23:09
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by AnythingButVista"
RE[4]: Comment by AnythingButVista
by Mellin on Thu 3rd Nov 2011 23:15
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by AnythingButVista"
RE[3]: Comment by AnythingButVista
by ilovebeer on Fri 4th Nov 2011 16:39
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by AnythingButVista"
In the end of course you can assemble your own machine, getting a motherboard with sane BIOS, and avoiding all this junk. But that's not the point. The point is a principle of having a choice for the user of any machine, not just the one you assembled on your own. It doesn't matter whether it costs $350 or $1000. Lower price doesn't mandate crippling the device in regards of user's control.
This may come as a shock but a company protecting their interests is more important than your view on principles. Further, the fact that users have a number of options is _exactly_ the point. Nobody is being forced to purchase "Designed for Windows 8" systems, they are willingly choosing to do so. If such a system doesn't suit their needs, don't buy the system. The idea is very very very simple yet some act as if merely suggesting it is like ripping their arms and legs off.





Member since:
2010-06-08
In the end of course you can assemble your own machine, getting a motherboard with sane BIOS, and avoiding all this junk. But that's not the point. The point is a principle of having a choice for the user of any machine, not just the one you assembled on your own. It doesn't matter whether it costs $350 or $1000. Lower price doesn't mandate crippling the device in regards of user's control.
Edited 2011-11-03 22:50 UTC