Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Nov 2011 19:34 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Thread beginning with comment 495823
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-16
Hi,
This is short-sighted (and I've seen it multiple times from multiple people).
In the short term I think you're right - for desktop/workstation/server (and not for smaller stuff like tablets and notebooks), OEMs will want to support Win7; and other OSs (Linux, Solaris, the three BSDs, etc) will only be screwed on some of the smaller stuff.
In the longer term, OEMs will eventually forget about Win7 (in the same way that no sane OEM cares about Win98 anymore). This is what other OSs (and companies like Redhat, and organisations like FSF and GNU) should be worried about - not the next few years, but the next few decades.
A man jumps off of a 20 storey building. While passing the tenth floor observers hear him say "Going well so far"...
- Brendan