Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Nov 2011 19:34 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Thread beginning with comment 496277
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Ok, let's be fair
by ilovebeer on Mon 7th Nov 2011 15:58
in reply to "RE[7]: Ok, let's be fair"
Again, this is not about fear mongering, but about saying to OEMs "see, we might have problems if you implemented SecureBoot in a certain way. Could you do it this other way instead?".
I seriously don't know why people is making such a huge issue of anyone making that request.
I seriously don't know why people is making such a huge issue of anyone making that request.
Who has a problem with the request? Nobody that I've seen. My problem is with people who are intentionally being misleading, untruthful, or flat out lying seemingly in an attempt to create fear. Then you have the ones who may genuinely have their head in the clouds thinking they have rights that don't actually exists and all of that.
When did wanting people to be educated and knowledgeable on a topic become a bad thing? I prefer to have discussions based in reality while there are others who obviously prefer fantasy.




Member since:
2007-03-06
When did secure boot on "Designed for Windows 8" prebuilt systems suddenly turn into the elimination of nearly anything not being the logo? It didn't. The fear mongers and your imagination is getting the better of you because there is not a single shred of evidence or proof that what you've proposed will actually happen. Fearing the rapture doesn't make the rapture come true -- you should be well aware of by now.
"Will any OEM be selling PCs and laptops without Windows8 in a couple of years?
Yes, of course. This is not even in question for those of us who know better than to buy into the baseless imaginary BS that anything non-Windows 8 will soon cease to exist. "
Again, this is not about fear mongering, but about saying to OEMs "see, we might have problems if you implemented SecureBoot in a certain way. Could you do it this other way instead?".
I seriously don't know why people is making such a huge issue of anyone making that request.