To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
[quote]You have to choose between having a Software Center that has paid games and hence is actually worth visting (Ubuntu) and an environment that's usable but doesn't have a Software Center with paid games (Mint).
On the other hand, I am glad to see Canonical and their "release every 6 months even if it's broken" method, to be replaced by Mint and it's "when it's done" method. If it's possible to use Canonical's software center with Mint, then Ubuntu should be abandoned IMO.
[/quote]
Mint uses the same repositories and software packages as Ubuntu does. There's nothing preventing someone from running the Software Centre in Mint.
Of course if Ubuntu was abandoned, as you suggest, then Mint wouldn't have all that software as its base and wouldn't be able to use Ubuntu's Software Centre. Which makes me think you haven't thought this all the way through.




Member since:
2011-04-11
1% of user market share is what they say"
Correct. The real numbers are even lower. If you take out from that 1% all the Fedoras, Archs, Gentoos etc that don't stand a chance of being well received by the average consumer, the actual market share Ubuntu and Linux Mint have combined is even lower. After all, there is no “Linux“ or “GNU/Linux“. Just “Linux-based OS“. What people call "Linux" is a bunch of different semi-compatible OSes that simply have some common codebase in the kernel and basic utilities. So it would be more accurate to list the percentage of each "distro" (aka the percentage of each linux-based OS) seperately. Oh, and you personally might be a techie and have managed to convert your relatives to some linux distro, but for most people linux-based OSes are a no-no. Sorry, but that's the way it is. You can pretend linux-based OSes have more than 1% share by pointing out to slashdot visitor statistics, but sadly it won't make it a truth.
As regards the Mint vs Ubuntu thing, it's sad to see the Linux Desktop being broken into too major "distros" (instead of one major "distro"). You have to choose between having a Software Center that has paid games and hence is actually worth visting (Ubuntu) and an environment that's usable but doesn't have a Software Center with paid games (Mint).
On the other hand, I am glad to see Canonical and their "release every 6 months even if it's broken" method, to be replaced by Mint and it's "when it's done" method. If it's possible to use Canonical's software center with Mint, then Ubuntu should be abandoned IMO.
Edited 2011-11-07 12:27 UTC