Linked by Allen Boyles on Mon 7th Nov 2011 09:46 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces In the commercial software world, user interfaces are generally designed by one group. Like Microsoft for Windows or Apple for Mac OS. Those desktop environments were designed by one company who did things like user testing and statistical analysis to try and make the desktop they thought would work best. Linux is different. Large groups definitely DO perform user testing and statistical analysis, but one group can also say "Here's what we want" and, if they have the ability to code it, their idea comes into being. It's pretty amazing, when you think about it. Linux lets people create what they want. If you don't like what's out there, fork it! Or start from scratch! You're in control!
Thread beginning with comment 496543
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: This is not an either/or
by WorknMan on Tue 8th Nov 2011 23:08 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: This is not an either/or"
Member since:

It is sometimes straightforward to answer the question. Everything which is highly dependent on taste, like theming and notification sounds, should be customizable.

Even that is not always straightforward. For example, Is it really necessary to add theme support for every single app on the system, instead of leaving themes at the OS level where they belong, so that all apps have a consistent look and feel?

Reply Parent Score: 2

Neolander Member since:

Oh, I was talking about OS-level functionality*, sorry for not pointing it out ! On their side, applications should certainly do their best in order to avoid duplicating it.

* I include GUI toolkits and DEs in my definition of a (complete) desktop OS

Edited 2011-11-09 06:25 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1