Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Nov 2011 21:32 UTC, submitted by cristoper
Thread beginning with comment 497227
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I have, I've just generally avoided Be-related posts because I didn't understand the appeal. Serves me right for giving the topic a chance, I guess. It's just so painful to see a sub-group of the obscure OS fandom not learn from their forerunners. Can't Be people see the Amiga users and realise how crazy they must sound to everyone else? 




Member since:
2005-07-06
Did... did BeOS have Thom's child or something? Wikipedia doesn't back up the assertion that it had a "soul". Classic Mac, Amiga, and NeXT enthusiasts have been saying basically the same things about their own computers since the late 80s, and it's just bizarrely arrogant to see someone say BeOS was the "only" piece of software that deserves this title.
Hey, another Amiga user! Finally, someone who understands that Be fanboys are morons! (Think twice about that thumbs-down button, buddy -- that's just my opinion.)
Have you been reading OSNews long? After a while, you'll get used to it, roll your eyes, and say, "Yeah, that's just Thom." & maybe one day you'll bestir yourself to do something about it & contribute something. Most of us just whine about, though. :-P
Edited 2011-11-15 16:24 UTC