To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think you guys are right. I am currently running Kubuntu and it was nowhere near as snappy as Ubuntu 11.04 was and I am running 11.10 right now. I am going to give OpenSuse a shot when I get my new work laptop. Too much hassle to reinstall and set up all my development tools.
I have found no differences of performance between Fedora, Kubuntu and even Arch KDE's. Arch which was supposed to be the "faster" KDE, it's really not. It is just the same to me. Now I am a bit glad that I got fglrx working alright in Kubuntu. But Kubuntu took the lead because it ships the Ubuntu fonts, which I find them really nice for the UI, whereas other distros are using weird fonts.
I still see some shortcomings with KDE, but it's just some PolicyKit crashes, the plain X non-aliased fonts, and minor configuration as defaults. If one can spend the time to overcome this, it's actually better than GNOME.
Edited 2011-11-17 14:17 UTC





Member since:
2009-05-23
Kubuntu is slow because it's the red-headed stepchild of Canonical. If you want KDE go with the traditional KDE distros like OpenSUSE and Mandriva. These are the vendors that work on optimizing their distros for KDE.