Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 17th Nov 2011 08:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 497482
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
>censorship
>democratic countries
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
>censorship
>democratic countries
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
>democratic countries
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
While democracy is supposed to imply that all citizens have an equal say in decisions that affect their lives, it has actually come to mean that all you get is to choose a temporary dictator among a subset of candidates sponsored by private interests.
There's also one here in Norway. Granted, it's for "preventing access to child pornography" - it's still a secret blacklist that all ISP needs to implement.
Indeed, and that's just what happened here in the UK. Content holders have successfully forced some ISPs to use their child porn filter to blacklist a usenet search engine.
Consider this. All the South Korean websites are monitored by the government's presidential agency. The police agencies and the Supreme Prosecutors' Office can track almost every post you wrote through your Residence Registration Number. They can imprison you with "internet" evidences.





Member since:
2009-06-09
There's also the Great Firewall of South Korea, a masterpiece of the conservative government at present. Maybe internet censorship is a growing trend among democratic countries.