Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sat 22nd Oct 2005 03:07 UTC, submitted by carbon-12
Thread beginning with comment 49772
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Isn't WINE reverse engineering - hence illegal?
by rayiner on Sat 22nd Oct 2005 18:59
in reply to "RE[2]: Isn't WINE reverse engineering - hence illegal?"
I hope you are right. But the above is probably from before the Bnetd decision, and what can prevent Microsoft from changing their EULA to preclude other operating systems?
Even if you consider an EULA a contract, you have to realize that contracts cannot contain arbitrary statements. For example, I could have an EULA on this post that says "by reading this post you are agreeing to give rayiner $10". However, if I actually brought you to court over it, no judge would actually rule in my favor!





Member since:
"Quote from Codeweavers' web site:
Emphasis mine...
Q. Can Microsoft prevent CodeWeavers' customers from running Microsoft applications on Linux?
A. No. Microsoft's end-user licenses do not preclude operating their applications under other operating systems"
I hope you are right. But the above is probably from before the Bnetd decision, and what can prevent Microsoft from changing their EULA to preclude other operating systems? Anti-trust law, as some have suggested? We already know how that went the last time it was used.