Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 21st Nov 2011 07:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 497849
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Wait, so I need to change MY own network's name?
by phoenix on Tue 22nd Nov 2011 18:38
in reply to "RE: Wait, so I need to change MY own network's name?"
RE[3]: Wait, so I need to change MY own network's name?
by vrwarp on Tue 22nd Nov 2011 19:40
in reply to "RE[2]: Wait, so I need to change MY own network's name?"
So you're basically saying, don't run the service for the public to use. It is an exceptionally useful service for really anything that wants to be geolocation aware because under many circumstances geolocation based off of wifi+cell towers is a lot more accurate and faster than gps alone (cities....)
In any case, people seem to be forgetting that you need to submit two nearby SSIDs to get a location. Also, google isn't the only provider of this service. Microsoft has one (public), Apple has one, and there is another company called Skyhook that provides the service commercially.




Member since:
2010-11-11
Could you propose a better opt-in/opt-out mechanism?
If it were opt-in, what would stop me from opting-in all the networks around where I live?
If it were opt-out, what would stop me from opting-out all the networks around where I live?
While the solution is a kind of clunky, it is the easiest way to guarantee that the owner of the router does *not* want their network being used to provide geolocation.
Of course, you could argue that it should be _map as an opt-in instead of _nomap as an opt-out, but then the service would be dead on arrival.