Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 21st Nov 2011 07:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 497882
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
UZ64,
I agree with you and everyone else that google's opt out proposal is stupid, but your argument against the database is quite different from everyone else's. It seems like you object to the mere fact of your WiFi's existence being published, regardless of whether it includes your personal MAC addresses?
If so, I think that logic is going way too far. I don't care if anyone knows how many WiFi devices are around my area - it doesn't reveal anything about me. My objection only crops up when equipment can be individually tracked.