Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 27th Nov 2011 22:07 UTC, submitted by Nooone
Thread beginning with comment 498253
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Effort is there, but why don't they go 100%??
by YEPHENAS on Mon 28th Nov 2011 01:03
in reply to "RE: Effort is there, but why don't they go 100%??"
RE[3]: Effort is there, but why don't they go 100%??
by Delgarde on Mon 28th Nov 2011 01:29
in reply to "RE[2]: Effort is there, but why don't they go 100%??"
RE[3]: Effort is there, but why don't they go 100%??
by UltraZelda64 on Tue 29th Nov 2011 04:46
in reply to "RE[2]: Effort is there, but why don't they go 100%??"
It took the Gnome devs almost two years with dozens of developers. And the Mate guys should repeat the same? With how many developers? Two or three? And when they are done they will have ... tada! ... something that is equivalent to Gnome 3 fallback mode.
...which will be depreciated and abandoned soon enough. Once GNOME 3 is able to run without 3D hardware acceleration. So your point is...?




Member since:
2008-08-19
Just one catch with that - someone has to actually port MATE to GTK3. And while in theory the Gnome devs have already done most of the work in that regard, the MATE devs are still going to be maintaining all the bits that upstream no longer support.
Which, for the most part, are the really ugly pieces that nobody wanted to touch, and had been bitrotting for years in the Gnome repos...