Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Nov 2011 22:55 UTC, submitted by fran
Thread beginning with comment 498311
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: We already have enough JVM languages
by moondevil on Mon 28th Nov 2011 17:22
in reply to "RE: We already have enough JVM languages"
RE[3]: We already have enough JVM languages
by DavidStone on Mon 28th Nov 2011 21:59
in reply to "RE[2]: We already have enough JVM languages"




Member since:
2011-08-26
@moondevil: Take a look at Crack at http://code.google.com/p/crack-language/ which uses LLVM for JIT and AOT compilation.
It's portable to platforms that the LLVM runtime is ported to, with a "bitcode" intermediate format that's analogous to JVM bytecode, although at a lower level.
One advantage it has over VM-based languages is that there's no barrier between it and native libraries. And of course it benefits from all the LLVM work on optimization etc. from lots of people.
Edited 2011-11-28 16:47 UTC