Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 1st Dec 2011 22:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 498637
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: BlackBerry, really?
by Jondice on Thu 1st Dec 2011 21:33
in reply to "RE[2]: BlackBerry, really?"
RE[4]: BlackBerry, really?
by Morgan on Fri 2nd Dec 2011 11:03
in reply to "RE[3]: BlackBerry, really?"
Well I still play Thief and, dated as it is, nothing comes close to the atmosphere and feel of the game world itself. It was steampunk before steampunk was in the mainstream. And taken as a whole the gameplay is unique, though many other games borrow bits and pieces from it (Assassin's Creed, Deus Ex, Metal Gear Solid etc).
I will say that the Rogue class on World of Warcraft at least gave me the stalking/stealth and pickpocketing aspects of the game, which is why I always went for a Subtlety/Assassination build when playing one.





Member since:
2005-06-29
Interesting, I was always under the impression that the carriers had a lot of influence when it came to their unique versions of the BB OS. Back in the day I would play with different carriers' versions of the OS for the Storm phones, as I was using a Storm on AT&T's network and I wanted the best experience. There were a lot of low-level differences among each build.
I've been trying to convince gog.com to get the rights to redistribute the Thief series in a modern playable format. So far they have kindly told me to "taff off".
That said, I imagine something like CarrierIQ would be blocked by RIM as it contradicts their marketing regarding security.
By the way, nice to see another Thief fan out there.