Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Dec 2011 22:41 UTC
Apple "Apple could face disruption to its iPad sales in China after a court rejected its claim to own the iPad trademark in the country and a rival sought to halt sales of the tablet device in two Chinese cities. The developments are the latest in a long-running dispute between Apple and Proview Technology (Shenzhen), a struggling Taiwanese-owned company that registered trademarks for the name IPAD in many countries long before Apple conceived its smash hit tablet computer." Apple is clearly copying from this innovative Chinese company. If Apple fanatics are actually consistent (*), they would condemn Apple for this clear case of theft.
Thread beginning with comment 499390
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by ephracis
by Moredhas on Thu 8th Dec 2011 07:53 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by ephracis"
Member since:

Before then, I think it was commonplace to prefix things with "Intelligent" or "Intelli", but I could be misremembering. This was more than half my life ago ;)

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Comment by ephracis
by MOS6510 on Thu 8th Dec 2011 08:11 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by ephracis"
MOS6510 Member since:

Intelligent Design? ;-)

I don't recall any general naming trend. I think most naming conventions were more or less restricted to certain brands. I think IBM liked to put an e in front of stuff.

Personally I would prefer any naming strategy to actually mean something.

Apple's i stood for Internet, but most iPods don't have Internet access. Only the iPod touch does and it came years after the original iPod. It's a cool name, but I don't see a link between Internet, a pod (I do know where they got that name from) and a media player.

Reply Parent Score: 2