Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Dec 2011 22:24 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 499401
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Clarification - OSS but not FOSS
by jabjoe on Thu 8th Dec 2011 12:47
in reply to "RE: Clarification - OSS but not FOSS"
RE[3]: Clarification - OSS but not FOSS
by jabjoe on Thu 8th Dec 2011 20:10
in reply to "RE[2]: Clarification - OSS but not FOSS"
RE[2]: Clarification - OSS but not FOSS
by lemur2 on Fri 9th Dec 2011 04:41
in reply to "RE: Clarification - OSS but not FOSS"
Windows Phone Store != Windows Store.
Ah, OK. Point taken.
<sarcasm>Forgive me for getting a bit confused, I don't know how I could possibly have got that mixed. Obviously if software is for a phone it makes the world of difference if it is copyleft, compared to software for a desktop.</sarcasm>
Err, WTF?
RE[3]: Clarification - OSS but not FOSS
by Neolander on Fri 9th Dec 2011 08:50
in reply to "RE[2]: Clarification - OSS but not FOSS"
Member since:
2005-06-29
Windows Phone Store != Windows Store.