Linked by David Adams on Sun 11th Dec 2011 01:37 UTC, submitted by rhyder
Linux It's starting to look like the end of an era for Ubuntu users as Canonical mull the creation of an ISO that won't fit onto a CDR. The question is, does it matter? Canonical owes at least part of its success with Ubuntu Linux to the unique way that it has been distributed. From the start it has been available as a downloadable ISO image and a free CD, posted at no cost to the user. This was great news for people who wanted to install Linux but did not have the luxury of a decent Internet connection. In a sense, installing via a CDR image has always been like a kind of cache, in that you're moving part of the content that you need onto permanent storage rather than pulling it through the network connection
Thread beginning with comment 499750
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Why not have two versions?
by WorknMan on Sun 11th Dec 2011 03:31 UTC
Member since:

Why not have two different versions of the product - a 'Lite' version for those still living out in the sticks with a dialup connection, and a 'humpty dumpty' deluxe version for everyone else. That's better than the 7+ different versions that Windows has ;)

Reply Score: 4

RE: Why not have two versions?
by AdamW on Mon 12th Dec 2011 03:39 in reply to "Why not have two versions?"
AdamW Member since:

For most distros, it's not two versions, because most distros already ship multiple live images for different desktops. So it's not two images rather than one image, but, say, eight images rather than four. That's a significant difference in terms of release engineering, QA, documentation, and even site design.

Reply Parent Score: 2