Linked by snydeq on Sun 11th Dec 2011 01:35 UTC
General Development Fatal Exception's Neil McAllister writes in favor of new programming languages given the difficulty of upgrading existing, popular languages. 'Whenever a new programming language is announced, a certain segment of the developer population always rolls its eyes and groans that we have quite enough to choose from already,' McAllister writes. 'But once a language reaches a certain tipping point of popularity, overhauling it to include support for new features, paradigms, and patterns is easier said than done.' PHP 6, Perl 6, Python 3, ECMAScript 4 -- 'the lesson from all of these examples is clear: Programming languages move slowly, and the more popular a language is, the slower it moves. It is far, far easier to create a new language from whole cloth than it is to convince the existing user base of a popular language to accept radical changes.'
Thread beginning with comment 499835
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: improve current languages
by moondevil on Sun 11th Dec 2011 16:26 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: improve current languages"
moondevil
Member since:
2005-07-08

If you have a proper computer science background you'll be able to pick new languages/concepts in no time.

The proper way is to master the concepts not the tools.

EDIT: missing word

Edited 2011-12-11 16:26 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

juzzlin Member since:
2011-05-06

If you have a proper computer science background you'll be able to pick new languages/concepts in no time.

The proper way is to master the concepts not the tools.



That's not the problem. As I see it, the problem is that you usually have a lot of re-usable code, classes, frameworks and engines written in some language and you'd have to re-write or port that code into the new language. And it would be a huge and wasted effort.

Reply Parent Score: 1