Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th Dec 2011 23:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 499889
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think he was referring to when HTC bought out S3 (technically both are owned by the same people so it was a matter of re-arranging the chairs on the deck). The argument one could make is that HTC only bought out S3 to screw over Apple.
It was Apple that sued HTC first, if I am not mistaken. So Apple tried to screw over HTC. HTC, then, bought S3 to defend itself, not to screw anyone over (did they start using these patents against anyone else?).




Member since:
2005-07-06
I think he was referring to when HTC bought out S3 (technically both are owned by the same people so it was a matter of re-arranging the chairs on the deck). The argument one could make is that HTC only bought out S3 to screw over Apple.
True, and if he doesn't like it he can always avoid those stories - there are lots of uninteresting stories on OSNews.com which I ignore but I'm sure are really interesting to other readers. One of the things I do find funny are the number of people who run from Apple to Microsoft then to Sun Microsystems then back to Microsoft then over to Linux then back to Microsoft again - looking for someone or something they can put in a pedestal and worship like a deity. Whether you're running Windows, Mac OS X or some other platform the parent company will always do a mixture of good, bad and ugly - this idea of injecting so much emotional investment into owning a computer seems a little strange from my point of view.