Linked by snydeq on Sun 11th Dec 2011 01:35 UTC
General Development Fatal Exception's Neil McAllister writes in favor of new programming languages given the difficulty of upgrading existing, popular languages. 'Whenever a new programming language is announced, a certain segment of the developer population always rolls its eyes and groans that we have quite enough to choose from already,' McAllister writes. 'But once a language reaches a certain tipping point of popularity, overhauling it to include support for new features, paradigms, and patterns is easier said than done.' PHP 6, Perl 6, Python 3, ECMAScript 4 -- 'the lesson from all of these examples is clear: Programming languages move slowly, and the more popular a language is, the slower it moves. It is far, far easier to create a new language from whole cloth than it is to convince the existing user base of a popular language to accept radical changes.'
Thread beginning with comment 499920
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: improve current languages
by juzzlin on Mon 12th Dec 2011 12:23 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: improve current languages"
Member since:

If you have a proper computer science background you'll be able to pick new languages/concepts in no time.

The proper way is to master the concepts not the tools.

That's not the problem. As I see it, the problem is that you usually have a lot of re-usable code, classes, frameworks and engines written in some language and you'd have to re-write or port that code into the new language. And it would be a huge and wasted effort.

Reply Parent Score: 1