Linked by snydeq on Sun 11th Dec 2011 01:35 UTC
General Development Fatal Exception's Neil McAllister writes in favor of new programming languages given the difficulty of upgrading existing, popular languages. 'Whenever a new programming language is announced, a certain segment of the developer population always rolls its eyes and groans that we have quite enough to choose from already,' McAllister writes. 'But once a language reaches a certain tipping point of popularity, overhauling it to include support for new features, paradigms, and patterns is easier said than done.' PHP 6, Perl 6, Python 3, ECMAScript 4 -- 'the lesson from all of these examples is clear: Programming languages move slowly, and the more popular a language is, the slower it moves. It is far, far easier to create a new language from whole cloth than it is to convince the existing user base of a popular language to accept radical changes.'
Thread beginning with comment 499994
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: "Better" vs. Better
by lucas_maximus on Tue 13th Dec 2011 11:35 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: "Better" vs. Better"
lucas_maximus
Member since:
2009-08-18

TL;DR : Hackish cost is fast to write and a powerful research and testing tool, it should just not make its way to the final product IMHO.


No I agree, but you will always find better ways of doing something down the line.

Reply Parent Score: 2