Linked by David Adams on Sun 11th Dec 2011 01:37 UTC, submitted by rhyder
Linux It's starting to look like the end of an era for Ubuntu users as Canonical mull the creation of an ISO that won't fit onto a CDR. The question is, does it matter? Canonical owes at least part of its success with Ubuntu Linux to the unique way that it has been distributed. From the start it has been available as a downloadable ISO image and a free CD, posted at no cost to the user. This was great news for people who wanted to install Linux but did not have the luxury of a decent Internet connection. In a sense, installing via a CDR image has always been like a kind of cache, in that you're moving part of the content that you need onto permanent storage rather than pulling it through the network connection
Thread beginning with comment 500086
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by yoshi314@gmail.com
by yoshi314@gmail.com on Wed 14th Dec 2011 11:29 UTC
yoshi314@gmail.com
Member since:
2009-12-14

i think distros should provide a cd-sized install media, is a good size to go for, as it offers a relatively reasonable download, even for people with slower connection.

usb boot is not really reliable - many computers have quirky usb booting and a lot of workarounds need to be applied.

dvd images are fine too, but i often feel they pack way too much things than necessary.

Edited 2011-12-14 11:43 UTC

Reply Score: 1

ilovebeer Member since:
2011-08-08

usb boot is not really reliable - many computers have quirky usb booting and a lot of workarounds need to be applied.

You've got to be kidding. This simply isn't true. There may be some handful of old mainboards that don't handle usb boot well but even those probably have bios updates that fix the problem. We've been installing from usb for years and I can count on one hand how many times it was a problem.

Reply Parent Score: 1

Yoko_T Member since:
2011-08-18

"usb boot is not really reliable - many computers have quirky usb booting and a lot of workarounds need to be applied.

You've got to be kidding. This simply isn't true. There may be some handful of old mainboards that don't handle usb boot well but even those probably have bios updates that fix the problem. We've been installing from usb for years and I can count on one hand how many times it was a problem.
"

This is one hell of a lot more common than people like you think it is.

I've got one of these computers with one of these Intel-made motherboards made around 2005-2006. The Intel Bios does seem to really support booting from a usb drive, but it seems to be really picky about you format the drive. Syslinux in particular gives me nothing but grief on this machine,which is ironic, since the main developer as I understand it either worked for Intel or still does.

People have complained on the Syslinux mailing list for years about how syslinux doesn't seem to be able to boot from some computers like mine and all we've gotten a load of BS about BIOS problems when the problems really seem to lie within Syslinux itself and how it handles booting from usb drives.

Reply Parent Score: 1