Linked by David Adams on Tue 13th Dec 2011 03:12 UTC
Editorial I was reading today about how Linux Mint developers altered the Banshee music player source code to redirect affiliate revenue from Amazon music orders to them instead of Banshee. They've reportedly made less than $4, which has caused a kerfluffle among those paying attention to that corner of the world. But it raises a larger point that has been swirling around for a couple of decades: an OS vendor has a lot of power to influence, and even monetize their user base. Where should they draw the line?
Thread beginning with comment 500316
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

I've yet to find any OS that does everything. It just depends on what type of grief your willing to accept in exchange for the distro specific benefits.

If somebody recommends a Linux app that is not in my distro repository (or it's several versions behind), you may call that market differentiation, but I call it fragmentation.

If the local Italian eatery doesn't serve Chinese food then it must be fragmentation of the resteraunt industry. The Italian and Chinese resteraunts should all merge into one mega-corporation owned by Toco Bell. It's the only way to solve the scourge of fragmentation and strife of choosing where to eat dinner tonight!

If the app is not in your distribution's repository but is in another's then that would seem to differentiate the two products based on what component parts they include. I'm pretty sure the VW Bug and Ford F150 don't include all the same component parts yet we don't claim that the auto industry is fragmented as a result. Turns out we simply choose the vehicle that better fits our needs.

Reply Parent Score: 2