Linked by Howard Fosdick on Sat 17th Dec 2011 00:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 500435
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No idea, but anyone knows it's insane to always run as root for real work where security is even a slight concern, and for that reason Puppy is nothing more than a toy to them. If you asked a security person to do real-world tests on Puppy to get this data and they'll probably laugh and think you're joking. They'd probably think it's retarded to even do such a test targeting Puppy specifically when there is plenty real-world data to go through on the act of just running as root/admin alone. It's well documented; it's bad no matter what, just because it's Puppy and its users seem to be crazy rabid fanboys doesn't make it better.
Edited 2011-12-19 15:14 UTC




Member since:
2007-04-05
Running as root on Unix systems is anathema for any real use. It subverts the entire model of security and goes well beyond the browser itself. It's what made Windows ridiculously insecure to begin with, and that platform still hasn't entirely shaken the consequences.
Puppy: something to run off of a flash drive occasionally. Look elsewhere for a general-purpose system.