Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Dec 2011 11:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 500841
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?
by lustyd on Wed 21st Dec 2011 16:41
in reply to "RE[9]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?"
RE[11]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?
by shmerl on Wed 21st Dec 2011 16:45
in reply to "RE[10]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?"
RE[10]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?
by leos on Wed 21st Dec 2011 16:49
in reply to "RE[9]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?"
Who invented the telephone? Alexander Graham Bell (let's just leave the disputed history of the telehpone for what it is), or the guy who came up with the buttoned telephone?
So the only invention is that of the broad category? Of course not. Who invented the telephone? Alexander Graham Bell. Who invented the buttoned telephone? Mr Buttonous Maximus. Who invented the cordless phone? Mr Dontliketo Triponcables.
Understand? All of those things are inventions. If you stick to really broad categories, you miss 99% of inventions. Who invented the automobile? Most people would say Karl Benz. That was certainly significant, but even he was building on the designs of others. And would it be fair to give him the credit for the automobile and every other development since then is just simple improvement?
RE[11]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?
by lustyd on Wed 21st Dec 2011 17:39
in reply to "RE[10]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?"
"Who invented the telephone? Alexander Graham Bell (let's just leave the disputed history of the telehpone for what it is), or the guy who came up with the buttoned telephone?
So the only invention is that of the broad category? Of course not. Who invented the telephone? Alexander Graham Bell. Who invented the buttoned telephone? Mr Buttonous Maximus. Who invented the cordless phone? Mr Dontliketo Triponcables.
Understand? All of those things are inventions. If you stick to really broad categories, you miss 99% of inventions. Who invented the automobile? Most people would say Karl Benz. That was certainly significant, but even he was building on the designs of others. And would it be fair to give him the credit for the automobile and every other development since then is just simple improvement? "
Very well said. The difference is that mr Benz made a quite different machine than the previous car. If BMW released a car identical to a Mercedes apart from the wing mirrors and steering wheel then they would be accused of copying just as Samsung have been with their device where they made an iPhone with a square button!
RE[10]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?
by rhavyn on Fri 23rd Dec 2011 21:51
in reply to "RE[9]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?"
Who invented the web browser, Tim-Berners Lee, or the guys behind Netscape?
Applying this to the current situation:
Who invented the smartphone, IBM, or Apple?
Who invented the graphical user interface, Xerox, or Apple?
Who invented the mouse, Douglas Engelbart, or Apple?
Who invented the tablet, GRiD, or Apple?
See what I mean?
Applying this to the current situation:
Who invented the smartphone, IBM, or Apple?
Who invented the graphical user interface, Xerox, or Apple?
Who invented the mouse, Douglas Engelbart, or Apple?
Who invented the tablet, GRiD, or Apple?
See what I mean?
Unfortunately you make a really good point, but you obviously don't see it. Tim-Berners Lee might have "invented" the world wide web, but Netscape made it what it is today. Xerox might have made a GUI based computer, but Apple took that and introduced overlapping windows, menus, etc. and made it into what people now associate with a computer. Engelbart might have invented the mouse, but to get from there to the ball mouse that eventually shipped with the Mac was a massive change. "Inventions" that are little more than tech demos are largely useless. And to take away the massive investment that companies like Netscape and Apple made to take what was, for all intents and purposes, a good idea and turn that into a desirable product, well, you can go back to Lee's internet, pre-iPad tablets and pre Mac GUIs and let us know how much you enjoy it.
RE[11]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?
by Alfman on Fri 23rd Dec 2011 23:18
in reply to "RE[10]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?"
rhavyn,
"And to take away the massive investment that companies like Netscape and Apple made to take what was, for all intents and purposes, a good idea and turn that into a desirable product, well, you can go back to Lee's internet, pre-iPad tablets and pre Mac GUIs and let us know how much you enjoy it."
I wonder if there's an objective way to make determinations about how other timelines would evolve if variables were tweaked here and there. Often times people claim that things would be worse if X hadn't happened. All can say for sure is that things would be different, but for all we know other time lines may actually be better than ours.
RE[11]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?
by tupp on Sat 24th Dec 2011 07:52
in reply to "RE[10]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?"
Unfortunately you make a really good point, but you obviously don't see it. Tim-Berners Lee might have "invented" the world wide web,...
No quotation marks needed -- Tim-Berners Lee invented the World Wide Web, period.
... but Netscape made it what it is today.
No. The web would have been what it is today, regardless of which browser was popular at which time. There were other graphical browsers when Mosaic was catching on.
Xerox might have made a GUI based computer, but Apple took that and introduced overlapping windows, menus, etc. and made it into what people now associate with a computer.
No.
Prior to Apple's Lisa and Mac, the GUI was already very close to what people now associate with a computer.
Apple didn't invent overlapping windows nor menus -- those features were already included in the Xerox Alto years before Apple existed, and overlapping windows and menus were also already featured in the GUIs from other companies, long before Apple demonstrated them.
Here are overlapping windows on the Alto: http://toastytech.com/guis/altost1.jpg
Here are floating menus on the Alto: http://toastytech.com/guis/altorainbow.jpg
Don't add the qualified claim that Apple invented "drop-down" menus, because drop-down menus are merely floating menus stuck to the bar at the top of the window. Furthermore, the Three Rivers Perq had "drop-down" menus on the side of some of its third-party GUI apps, before the Lisa and the Mac.
Engelbart might have invented the mouse, but to get from there to the ball mouse that eventually shipped with the Mac was a massive change.
No.
The "ball mouse" was invented in 1968, at least eight years before Apple Computer existed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouse_(computing)#Variants
Note in the page linked above that, Bill English (the guy who built Englebart's first mouse) created a ball mouse at Xerox Parc, later in 1972, and ball mice were manufactured for Xerox, starting in 1975 (one year before Apple existed) by The Mouse House.
At any rate, there was no particular advantage to the ball mouse. So, even if Apple had invented it or "popularized" it, it really was inconsequential.
"Inventions" that are little more than tech demos are largely useless.
If it weren't for the tech demos what would Steve Jobs and Bill Gates have had to copy?
No. Tech demos are notorious for having far-reaching consequences in the computer world.
And to take away the massive investment that companies like Netscape and Apple made to take what was, for all intents and purposes, a good idea and turn that into a desirable product, well, you can go back to Lee's internet, pre-iPad tablets and pre Mac GUIs and let us know how much you enjoy it.
Everything that Apple and Netscape did was being developed before, during and after Apple's and Netscape's work. All of that was already happening elsewhere while Apple and Netscape were doing their thing.
RE[11]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?
by MOS6510 on Sat 24th Dec 2011 08:50
in reply to "RE[10]: Does anybody here think Samsung did not copy Apple?"





Member since:
2005-06-29
"An invention is a novel composition, device, or process. An invention may be derived from a pre-existing model or idea, or it could be independently conceived."
You don't even know what invention means. Invention is not just a piece of hardware.
By the way, you think LG invented the capacitative touch screen? Don't be daft. Just because they slapped it onto a phone doesn't mean they invented it. However, they did invent that particular phone. "
Look, let me give you a few examples.
Who invented the telephone? Alexander Graham Bell (let's just leave the disputed history of the telehpone for what it is), or the guy who came up with the buttoned telephone?
Who invented the web browser, Tim-Berners Lee, or the guys behind Netscape?
Applying this to the current situation:
Who invented the smartphone, IBM, or Apple?
Who invented the graphical user interface, Xerox, or Apple?
Who invented the mouse, Douglas Engelbart, or Apple?
Who invented the tablet, GRiD, or Apple?
See what I mean?