To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
At least these are only forks of the GNOME 3.x shell, and not forks of "GNOME 3" itself.
A "GNOME 3" application will still look/work the same on all of these. It's just how you access/manage the apps that's different.
Wonder how many of these replacement GNOME 3 shells it will take until the GNOME-Shell/Unity devs realise they screwed up? 
But they are not forks of the same thing. Mate is a fork of Gnome 2, and I predict will disappear. Unity isn't a fork, as far as I am aware, but an alternate shell for Gnome 3, and Cinnamon is a fork of the Gnome 3 shell.
I haven't used any but Cinnamon looks the best of these alternatives - but not enough to tempt me away from Xfce.
I agree that MATE isn't sustainable long-term. What the Mint team is doing, IMHO is a much more realistic approach. And a mighty fine one at that! It's good to have options; it's also no secret that a lot of people aren't happy with either Gnome 3.x or Unity. Perhaps if these forks catch on with the masses than the mainline Gnome or Unity developers will get a clue and act accordingly.





Member since:
2005-07-06
So now we have Gnome Shell, Unity, Mate and Cinnamon. Any one else I missed?