Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Dec 2011 18:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 500932
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
tomchr,
"What worries me though is the aparrent gap between ARM and X86 versions of Windows 8. I really want a tablet with the ability of running legacy x86 applications."
For better or worse, that ship has sailed - tablets were capable of doing that circa 2001.
It's said that microsoft's tablet software was ahead of it's time, or ahead of the hardware anyway (P2 speeds, no battery life, hard disk drives, heavy, etc). Handwriting was a "first class data type".
http://www.winsupersite.com/article/windows-xp2/windows-xp-tablet-p...
I personally wanted one, but they were way out of my price range, so I never got one. If they could have been magically priced into the $500 range, I suspect there would have been enough demand to kick start the tablet market back then, even with limited hardware.
Unfortunately that didn't happen, and the modern tablets which are coming to market today are much more heavily influenced by DRM and corporate control than their predecessors.