Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Dec 2011 18:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 501083
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Worse than iPhone iOS 1.0?
by tony on Fri 23rd Dec 2011 18:52
in reply to "RE[2]: Worse than iPhone iOS 1.0?"
"The application would suspend, and when it ran again it would be at the same point it was before. True multitasking? No. But it worked great."
Just as in PalmOS.
But in palmos it was better. I can start typing a memo and, without saving it, switch to calendar, then again to memo and continue typing.
Just as in PalmOS.
But in palmos it was better. I can start typing a memo and, without saving it, switch to calendar, then again to memo and continue typing. You could always do that in iOS as well.
RE[4]: Worse than iPhone iOS 1.0?
by dragossh on Fri 23rd Dec 2011 19:26
in reply to "RE[3]: Worse than iPhone iOS 1.0?"




Member since:
2011-09-10
"The application would suspend, and when it ran again it would be at the same point it was before. True multitasking? No. But it worked great."
But in palmos it was better. I can start typing a memo and, without saving it, switch to calendar, then again to memo and continue typing.
Just as in PalmOS.