Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Dec 2011 21:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 501381
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, I bet some people here won't like what I'll say.
But if I was a phone maker, already paying Microsoft a fee for some bullshit patents, I won't, for sure, use their own phone operating system solution: I already give em' *enough* money for each Android phone I make and sell. And those are selling like hot cakes.
But if I was a phone maker, already paying Microsoft a fee for some bullshit patents, I won't, for sure, use their own phone operating system solution: I already give em' *enough* money for each Android phone I make and sell. And those are selling like hot cakes.
unfortunately MS charges the same amount for those BS patents as the whole Windows phone 7 license. In terms of monetary cost it is pretty much the same.
However, there are other non monetary costs (as you've said), the loss of the manufacturer brand, the loss of the phone model identity, and the cost of giving ms satisfaction.
As I've said many a time, no matter how good WP7 is, MS surely does not deserve to profit from it (since they profit of other things which they do not own and contribute nothing). I'd be perfectly happy for another competitor to join i.e. WebOS,bada,QNXed rim, anybody except MS.
Edited 2011-12-27 22:50 UTC




Member since:
2008-09-20
Well, I bet some people here won't like what I'll say.
But if I was a phone maker, already paying Microsoft a fee for some bullshit patents, I won't, for sure, use their own phone operating system solution: I already give em' *enough* money for each Android phone I make and sell. And those are selling like hot cakes.