To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not sure I'd like to have something like a cell phone if I'm in a situation where everybody around me is poor and starving. If people in the modern world get robbed for an (1 iPhone I don't want to know what they'll do in a less civilized country.
1: http://www.digisecrets.com/apple/android-and-blackberry-owners-insu...
I lived in a remote part of Mexico and was able to see, as internet arrived in the area, the benefits gained by those with the ability to access and use computers and the internet vs. those that could/would not. It meant better jobs and more food on the table. I'm not saying every one will have this experience, but Android is yet another lower-cost way to access information and as such will put that power in the hands of many more people. Is it the ultimate? Probably not, but it is the best option out there right now.





Member since:
2011-12-30
This has to be the longest running gag ever, this misguided notion that Linux, Android & Co. will do away with poverty and hardship everywhere. This is, of course, only possible by redefining the divide between rich and poor. It's now only a digital divide that has to be overcome. But how exactly overcoming this digital divide will affect the reality poor and underprivileged people live in, is conveniently left unexplained by guys like DeWitt Clinton.
The fact that poverty is rising in developed countries, too, where -- Android devices or not -- even poor people can in practice access information in public places such as libraries, is also conveniently ignored. How can that be that they remain poor, even though they are able to gain knowledge?
Could it possibly be that other factors are somehow playing a part? No! Monocausal reasoning wins.
Such utopianist fantasies really distort reality in an unprecedented way, it's almost worse than Marx.