Linked by Sean Haas on Wed 28th Dec 2011 23:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 501758
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-31
REAL-MODE?? Was that a misprint? Do modern compilers even generate that? I can't think of one good reason to target real mode these days.
Especially not if simplicity is a goal. Switching to protected mode is rather easy. I'd bet there are a lot of copy-this-code examples that you could just use (dunno, when I wrote my hobby OS I wanted to understand how it works, then wrote that one page of code myself), then have a flat, non-mapped 32-bit address space. That real mode segment juggling isn't really "simple" when you actually try to code something.