Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Jan 2012 19:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 501979
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-23
Let's separate Mono from .Net (C#) and Java from OpenJDK.
Let image that Microsoft start blocking all .Net development software. You will be forced to have only one IDE and pay whatever MS ask you to maintain your software. The same can happen with Oracle and Java.
In theory with Mono and OpenJDK (Open source java) even if Microsoft and Oracle freak out, the projects can continue to have a derivative work. So you will no longer depend on a vendor.
But the other problem is Software Patents.
Today Microsoft want to charge you "Software Patents" licenses for you using Linux and Android? What do you think that can happen for using Mono?
Oracle may do the same, there is no guarantee either. But I feel that with Java there is more IDEs and dev tools available in the market.
Edited 2012-01-03 16:13 UTC