Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Jan 2012 18:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 502145
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by MOS6510
by JAlexoid on Thu 5th Jan 2012 10:44
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by MOS6510"
It seems she was picked because she was in the Apple ad.
OMG is Touchstone copying 20th Century Fox? Because I'm sure that Johnny Depp got the role in Ed Wood with a dig fat "I was in Edward Scissorhands" on his resume... It's one thing copying an ad/product/design/packaging/whatever and totally another using experienced actors.
Edited 2012-01-05 10:51 UTC
RE[4]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Thu 5th Jan 2012 11:08
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by MOS6510"
One company makes an ad for a tablet, featuring a girl.
Another company, accused of copying the first company, makes an ad for a tablet, featuring the same girl.
A little girl, you call an experienced actor. It's not like she has many lines or actually acts. They could have picked any girl and there are many girls registered at casting bureaus. They didn't, they picked this girl.
You know Johnny Depp. Do you know what the girl's name is? Probably not, like most people do not.
Does she draw crowds like Johnny does? No, she doesn't.
Does Mr. Depp play a strange pirate for multiple movie studios? No, he doesn't.





Member since:
2011-05-12
She shouldn't be banned of course, but what are the odds of her appearing in the Samsung commercial? It seems she was picked because she was in the Apple ad.
They could have picked any other girl, I'm sure there are a lot more out there.
If Samsung is accused of copying Apple they shouldn't have casted this girl, because she hasn't got anything to do with their or Apple's products design and technical wise, but she did appear in an Apple commercial.