Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Jan 2012 18:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 502187
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by MOS6510
by testman on Thu 5th Jan 2012 09:32
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by MOS6510"
RE[4]: Comment by MOS6510
by Laurence on Thu 5th Jan 2012 10:45
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by MOS6510"
–and you accused the parent of false correlation? Hilarious.
How so? Development, prototyping and shipping time alone would make kaiwai's hypothesis highly improbable, where as those time scales fall within scope for my speculation.
Anyhow, your arrogant retort completely overlooks the fact that I was speculating rather than correlating (which is pretty clear if you go back and re-read my post). I never once pretended to know the reasons, I just presented a potential alternative motive, then quickly brushed it into the same group of assumptions as the other suggestions that have been posted (re: "whatever the reasons"). Kaiwai's theory, on the other hand, was presented as fact - and hence my "false correlation" comment.
Next time please read the subtleties of language before making your accusations.




Member since:
2007-03-26
Except they might be now because of the backlash when the original story broke.
then what is left to restore your name other than to copy your closest competitor that has a high retention and repeat purchase rate.
What you've done is raise two completely unrelated point and try to correlate them.
Samsung won't have done this because of any lost reputation due to the GalaxyS-gate of 2011. More likely they've done this because Apple have been behaving like school bullies trying to pinch lunch money. However I still think this is a stupid move by Samsung - whatever their motives - as it totally undermines their arguments that they're not out to copy Apple but in fact their products are a natural design.
I think you're being a bit melodramatic there. Samsung are no worse than most handset manufacturers for post sale support. While I'm not saying that's "right", it's certainly a bit righteous to single them out specifically.