Linked by snydeq on Thu 5th Jan 2012 15:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 502311
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Nginx and netcraft...
by lucas_maximus on Fri 6th Jan 2012 08:12
in reply to "RE: Nginx and netcraft..."
RE[3]: Nginx and netcraft...
by Vanders on Fri 6th Jan 2012 10:29
in reply to "RE[2]: Nginx and netcraft..."
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2006/04/06/april_2006_web_server_...
Microsoft gains 4.7 percent share while Apache loses 5.9 percent. The shift is driven by changes at domain registrar Go Daddy, which has just migrated more than 3.5 million hostnames from Linux to Windows
Michael van Dijken, Microsoft's Marketing Manager for Hosted Solutions, noted that Go Daddy's migration to Windows Server 2003 follows announcements of expanded relationships between Microsoft and several other major hosters, including Web.com (Interland), Verio and Rackforce.
RE[3]: Nginx and netcraft...
by Lennie on Fri 6th Jan 2012 10:35
in reply to "RE[2]: Nginx and netcraft..."
How about Netcraft themselves:
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2006/04/06/april_2006_web_server_...
And some Microsoft marketing:
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/mar06/03-21godaddypr....
Some random article from that time:
http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/09/netcraft-web-server-survey-or-shoul...




Member since:
2007-09-22
Actually no, you are confused.
Microsoft made deals with large domain hosters to serve their 'parked domains' on IIS (generic page shown for domains 'without a website').
That way it would inflate the usage share of IIS on the Internet so organisations like Netcraft would end up publishing graphs more favorable to IIS.
So they didn't pay Netcraft, they gave some really large hosters 'marketing budget' or whatever they called it.
Those contracts probably ran out around 2009 judging by the graphs.