Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Jan 2012 16:20 UTC, submitted by moondevil
Thread beginning with comment 503203
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Market share through vendor lock
by jared_wilkes on Fri 13th Jan 2012 19:32
in reply to "Market share through vendor lock"
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
This must mean that microsoft believes they can get away with it on arm, but not on x86.
However, even on x86, we still don't have answers as to whether dual booting into windows and linux will be possible without going into the bios to toggle secure boot (ms hasn't promised that windows 8 will run correctly with secure boot disabled).
The ability to disable secure boot on x86 is only half an answer, we (the legitimate owners) also need the ability to authorize/revoke the platform keys. Hard-coding microsoft keys will make alternative operating systems second class citizens on new platforms.