Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Jan 2012 16:20 UTC, submitted by moondevil
Thread beginning with comment 503278
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: I for one "platform of choice"
by dsmogor on Fri 13th Jan 2012 19:53
in reply to "RE[5]: I for one "platform of choice""
RE[7]: I for one "platform of choice"
by lucas_maximus on Fri 13th Jan 2012 19:57
in reply to "RE[6]: I for one "platform of choice""
Besides, think about all efforts to put Linux on recycled pc's for African people. In five years the same will concern all the tablets running obsolete versions of windows, but will be utterly impossible.
And the governments said we will have Windows PCs, because everybody uses Windows and we need people to have relevant IT skills.
RE[7]: I for one "platform of choice"
by dsmogor on Fri 13th Jan 2012 21:14
in reply to "RE[6]: I for one "platform of choice""
RE[6]: I for one "platform of choice"
by dsmogor on Fri 13th Jan 2012 21:06
in reply to "RE[5]: I for one "platform of choice""
Well Linux used be a niche product too but now it brings smartphone revolution to the masses. Without easily accessible commodity hardware it would have never grown past hobby status. As for bike analogy I can easily mix and match parts from various producers to build my dream vehicle. This is antithesis of what ms is doing.
RE[7]: I for one "platform of choice"
by lucas_maximus on Sat 14th Jan 2012 08:55
in reply to "RE[6]: I for one "platform of choice""
Well Linux used be a niche product too but now it brings smartphone revolution to the masses.
And my argument is that the masses do not care that it happens to run android. They by the phone, not the operating system.
Without easily accessible commodity hardware it would have never grown past hobby status.
No without large companies such as IBM, Google, Redhat it would have never got past hobby status.
As for bike analogy I can easily mix and match parts from various producers to build my dream vehicle. This is antithesis of what ms is doing.
No you cannot mix and match parts on a bicycle. Not since the early 90s.
Shimano have 4 different incompatible bottom bracket splines, and that is one component on a bicycle from one manufacturer. Some older cheap kit might work well together such as 5speed to 8 speed systems and resistance levers ... but anything modern such as STI flight deck shifters ... they won't work correctly.
Even a bicycle chains these days (10 speed compatible) have different proprietary joining mechanisms. KMC has a completely different joining mechanism to a shimano 10 speed chain, which again has a different joining mechanism again to a SRAM produced chain.
I could go on, about various braking systems that won't work together, but I think you get the point.
Edited 2012-01-14 08:57 UTC





Member since:
2009-08-18
You are a niche market. It is like with with Bicycle components, I pay for the fact I have specific requirements.
If you really cared that much about using your operating system of choice, you would produce the hard cash ... that is what I do with my rather custom Push bikes.
This might open a whole new market up for tablets that run Alternative Operating systems and create jobs ... but all you care about is saving a few pennies.